web (#2454)

(an instance of Generic Mail Recipient made by melusina)

     A mailing list for talking about the WWW. Sites you want to share, general discussion, philosophical meta-commentary. Or something like that.

Go to location of this object, Mail Distribution Center.

MAIL MESSAGES:


Date: 1995 Mar 6, 04:58:06 p.m. PST
From: melusina (#907)
To:   *graffiti (#107) and *web (#2454)
Subj: yet another list

Because I'm the one who posted the last thing to *cttr about websites, and because I have a mailing list fetish, I've gone ahead and made a list for WWW stuff. *web, *www, *w. I'll go ahead and forward all of the various web-ly posts to it; future posts should be sent there, I guess.

One thing I'm wondering: should this list just be for sites &c, or should we move the discussion of the MOO-WWW interface there too?

hiss,
mel the public servant.

Date: 1995 Mar 6, 05:10:25 p.m. PST
From: melusina (#907)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: pointers

Well, I've changed my mind about forwarding all the web stuff over here. There's a fair amount of it, and I don't feel like burning quota, so. Here's a list of the message numbers that have gone by so far, talking about this sort of thing.

On *graffiti:
204: Feb 20 17:41 Patro (#78) MOO/WWW
207: Feb 21 18:02 legba (#95) [Arc (#2145): Proposal #1]
208: Feb 21 18:03 legba (#95) [Arc (#2145): Proposal #2]
209: Feb 22 11:34 Marcus (#812) Arc's latest ideas
212: Feb 22 22:06 Kidd (#293) WWW server stuff
213: Feb 23 08:11 Trismegistos (#1457) Re: Kid's server implementation
214: Feb 24 11:27 Kid (#293) WWW server stuff
216: Mar 5 17:57 Patro (#78) FurryMUCK web page
217: Mar 6 13:08 Trismegistos (#1457) Web ideas

On *cttr:
37: Feb 20 17:11 Patro (#78) cool web interview
38: Feb 20 17:20 Patro (#78) better yet
40: Mar 6 13:04 Trismegistos (#1457) URL's for Webheads
>>41: Mar 6 14:06 melusina (#907) poetry on the web

wow, I'm helpful today.
hissing mel.

Date: 1995 Mar 9, 10:59:32 a.m. PST
From: Rebis (#875)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Burroughs page

There's a new William Burroughs website at http://www.hyperreal.com/wsb/
Looks pretty good; lots of links which I haven't had the time to check out yet.
--Rebis.

Date: 1995 Mar 14, 11:55:06 a.m. PST
From: Rebis (#875)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Delirium

Douglas Cooper's hypertext nove-in-progress, _Delirium_, is at http://www.timeinc.com/~twep/Features/Delirium/DelTitle.html
Cooper is the author of one previous (conventionally published novel), _Amnesia_, which interested and irritated me in equal measure. He's a very good stylist, and an intellectually stimulating writer; though ultimately I find him lacking in _vision_. But his new work, stylistically homogeneous with what came before, has the added interest of exploring the capabilities of hypertext format more interestingly than anything else I've seen this side of WAX.

Date: 1995 Mar 18, 10:59:34 p.m. PST
From: Stellah (#615)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Why?

I'm wondering why folks are interested in linking MOOs (generally, Dhalgren, specifically) to Web pages? Is easy access better? For what? Whom?
Just curious about the reasons... Stellah

Date: 1995 Mar 20, 07:56:44 a.m. PST
From: Trismegistos (#1457)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Why the Web?

1) Why not? Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.

2) The Web is to the Internet what Ma Bell was to the umpteen telephone service providers at the turn of the century -- the unifying protocol for information transfer. Quite simply, the Web is the future.

3) Being on the Web is like automatically being included in a popular Internet directory. The MOO can be connected to like-minded sites (sci-fi, postmodernism, etc.) and the "audience" for our creative efforts will grow exponentially, as browsers stumble across us.

4) The Web allows for expansions beyond text -- graphics, sound, movies. It's an infrastructure tailor-made for any future increases in bandwidth on the Net. Right now pictures are loaded middling-slow, other media at a snail's pace, but that is bound to change.

5) Web rules.

--Trism

Date: 1995 Mar 20, 10:46:38 a.m. PST
From: Patro (#78)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Why the web

Well, I don't thihk HTTP is going to take us too much further because its such a braindamaged protocol and it doesn't support interaction. But in the meantime, the web is pretty much the standard for multimedia hypertext.

Date: 1995 Mar 20, 02:24:13 p.m. PST
From: Marcus (#812)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: re: why

Marcus agrees with Patro about HTTP: it's kind of a cobblestone entrance-
ramp onto a highway that hasn't been built and doesn't yet have anyplace
to go.
But better protocols are being worked on; and for those of us who can't
or won't do that development, but want to get our feet wet in networked
hypertext ... well, www ain't bad. At least we'll get a sense of possibi-
lities and present limitations. And might make some cool stuff.
--mrx

Date: 1995 Mar 23, 10:14:33 p.m. PST
From: Stellah (#615)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: More why...

As a webmaster at a couple places at my university I understand the usefulness of it as a transition platform for online multimedia/browsing.
What I wonder about, though, is why would Dhalgren want to attract ... crowds?
I'm not convinced there are virtues in being accessible, easy-to-use, or multiply-linked into existing/future infrastructures.
Why?
I think there IS virtue in working for your literacy, because in the process you become socialized into the culture.
Call me elitist, but I'm also skeptical that the kind of traffic increase you could get with the Web would be the kind of traffic increase that's most desirable.
There are better reasons for building/doing things than 'because you can.'
Skeptically,
Stellah

Date: 1995 Jun 11, 07:43:45 p.m. PST
From: Trismegistos (#1457)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: My homepage

Trism's got a home page, yay. http://xp.psych.nyu.edu/~giner/Homepage.html
Check out my MOO page, links from the fringe (ooowoooweee), and marvel at the amount of stuff I have planned but yet to put in!
Cheers, triz

Date: 1995 Jun 12, 04:08:27 p.m. PST
From: Dave (#533)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: lovegrid


oh my.
er, this website does have an interesting interface,
technically speaking, of course.

http://desires.com/1.2/art/docs/lovegrid.html


Date: 1995 Jun 13, 02:33:54 p.m. PST
From: Patroclus (#78)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: FurryMUCK home page

Check out http://www.furry.com/

This is a great collection of web pages with the latest HTML3 and Netscape 1.1 features in use. Nice artwork, including a background image of little animal tracks (if you have a new enough browser to use it).
FurryMUCK and its satellites (RealmsMUCK, etc) are the most creative, perverted community to emerge from virtual reality. Be sure to check out their images (thousands of gif files of drawings) and stories.

Stephen White wrote MUCK before he wrote MOO. But the associated cultures are very different. Despite the superior server technology, MOOs seem to be disapointingly geeky compared to many other MUDs on the net. Furry is also more of a community than most MUDs.

Date: 1995 Jun 21, 02:01:56 p.m. PST
From: Patroclus (#78)
To:   *web (#2454)
Subj: Batman

For fans of mass culture, check out http://batmanforever.com

There's some amusing email/discussion pages ("Is Robin Gay?").